Tuesday, October 21, 2014

Scraps: Nuts to You


In this scrap, Charles A. Thayer is claiming that the prices on his fruits and nuts are the lowest in Kings County. At least I assume we can include fruits, as only the letter “s” is remaining from that word. Below, in addition to the nuts, we can see the prices of raisins, prunes and lemons and so can safely assume the word was indeed “fruits.”

It’s interesting to see the phrase, “Kings County” used. Many of you have heard of the area of New York known as Queens, but have not often heard of its neighbor Kings, or Kings County. In truth you may well be familiar with this section on the western tip of Long Island, but you know it better as Brooklyn.

And so to the nuts! Almonds seem to be the big ticket item here, and many a housewife must have complained at the price of 22 cents a pound. Brazils, Filberts and Peacans fare a little better, at only 15 cents a pound. And while my spell check has underlined, in shocking red, that spelling of pecan, at the same time I hear the voices of those from long ago as they whine, “That’s how we spelled it back then!” 

And perhaps they did. Still, doubt remains, as in the ad the word “department” is misspelled with an “h” in the position where the second “e” should be. This is clearly a result of poor 
proofreading, as we can safely say that at no time in history, today or in 1884, was the word ever spelled like that. I wonder if some poor guy got in trouble, or fired, for the error.

Hey, good catch. How do I know that this scrap of paper is from 1884? You can see there is no dateline on the top of the page. Ah, but a look on the other side of the scrap shows three columns of news under the heading “News of the Day,” and on the very edge of the fourth column there is a bit of a calendar displaying just a part of the first three months of the year, along with the year itself, which is 1884. My birthday was on a Sunday that year, even though my first birthday was actually still seventy years away.

In the news we are told that a great disaster occurred near Ontario, Canada, where there was a collision between two trains. It says, “What had before been a car full of strong, hearty men became in an instant a sickening death trap filled with mangled, bleeding humanity.” Now that’s some evocative writing!

In other news…”five men dead and two dying is the result of a lynching case in McDade, Texas.” Now, I have no idea what is being said here, although I’m not sure if it’s because I’m not fully understanding this 19th century English, or the writer is being vague on purpose. I suspect the latter.

Another story tells us that a woman in Illinois invited a man to her house. The man had allegedly “made aspersions on her character,” and when he admitted to the woman that he had, she shot him. Dead. Also, an intoxicated couple died when they drove their wagon over an embankment and were “smothered in the snow.” You know, I can’t help but think that people from 130 years ago would have really enjoyed television. 


2 Comments:

At 2:19 PM, Anonymous FUNGUS!!!! said...

My Mom's from Queens and my grandfather lived and died in and loved Brooklyn!!!

As for me, I have been there and really have no desire to go back.

Except for the food....just like in other countries, food is one thing that brings back memories of the good things about a place. New York does have some good places to eat all kinds of food!!!

That story of the train wreck really would have to dumbed down for today's readers....freakin' pussies!!!

The lynching case was probably just a bunch of " good ol' boys" having a good time and taking the law into their own hands!! Texas was still pretty wild in the 1880s!!

5 dead and 2 dying might mean they ran out of rope and had to drag the 2 behind their horses to finish the deed!!! (a racist event??)

Guns laws were almost non-existent in most areas back then and drunk drivers will always find a way to die...usually taking someone else with them!!

Interesting post...keep us updated on the past!!!


 
At 4:06 PM, Blogger Leonard Stegmann said...

Yes, they were much more lax abut guns back then...which is probably why they've almost completely disappeared from the US today.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

website-hit-counters.com
Provided by website-hit-counters.com site.